The Death Penalty Essay Sample free essay sample

The usage of decease punishment in our condemnable justness system continues to be a heatedly debated subject. In the United States. a bulk of people support capital penalty or decease punishment warranting it on the footing of the flagitious and peculiarly detestable nature of the offenses committed. However. there is a considerable resistance to this pattern and the oppositions argue that the province has no right to take the life of an single notwithstanding the moral corruption of the offense. Interestingly. all the states of the European Union have banned capital penalty or decease punishment. and a bulk of European public passionately opposes decease punishment sing it as a barbarian pattern. I myself. nevertheless. am in complete favour of decease punishment. As a individual with some grade of experience and expertness in this country. I regard it valid in the context of ghastly offenses. particularly those affecting multiple victims. I do uphold the impression of the sacredne ss of human life and its unconditioned self-respect ; but based strictly on practical considerations. We will write a custom essay sample on The Death Penalty Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page I think that implementing capital penalty judiciously and in exhaustively warranted fortunes is an acceptable and sensible class of action to take. Let me dig into the topic by supplying a historical overview of the tendencies in the pattern of decease punishment in our counntry. The decease punishment has ever existed in the United States. In the seventeenth century. there have been an estimated 162 executings which rose to 1. 391 in the undermentioned century. By the terminal of the 19th century. this figure increased dramatically. There have been over 1. 000 instances of capital penalty between 1880 to 1890. 1. 280 in the first decennary of the 20th century. and a similar figure in 1920’s. About 200 executings took topographic point in the twelvemonth 1935. and in 1950’s executings averaged at over 100 per every twelvemonth. In the 40 old ages between 1930 to 1970 there were a sum of 3. 859 executings taking topographic point under province or federal authorization. with a few hundred more under military authorization ( Daynes A ; Tatalovich 1998 ) . In the mid 1960’s the issue of decease punishment became controversial and started confronting a assortment of moral and legal challenges. In 1972. the instance of Furman v. Georgia led to a figure of alterations in the legal position of decease punishment. and to the alteration of some relevant legislative acts in a figure of provinces. There was a countrywide moratorium on the decease punishment which lasted until January of 1977. With the 1976 instance of Gregg v. Georgia. the pattern of capital penalty albeit under the restraints of the new revised guidelines. Nonetheless the rate of executings decreased significantly. Between 1977 and 1990. there were merely 140 executings in the full United States. However. most surprisingly. there were about 2. 400 inmates on province decease rows. This immense difference in the figure of people sentenced to decease and the existent figure of executings continues to our twenty-four hours. Supporters of capital penalty. including myself. stand vehemently against such indefinite hold in transporting out decease sentence. while the oppositions of capital penalty intelligibly expression at it in a favourable visible radiation. The oppositions view postconviction entreaties as possible chances for set uping the artlessness of the accused or the cogency of palliating fortunes ( Daynes A ; Tatalovich 1998 ) . In the recent decennaries. an increasing figure of states became abolitionist. and most oppositions to the pattern of capital penalty tend to believe that decease punishment even for the most dangerous of offenses has no hereafter. that it will bit by bit be eliminated from all parts of the universe as civilisation advancements. Many of these people consider the continued being of capital penalty to be a defect on the modern civilisation. a relic of violent and cold imposts of the yesteryear. They see it as a clear indicant of inhuman treatment and deficiency of compassion on the portion of the condemnable justness system. I can wholly sympathise with such positions. I besides consider compassion. and even forgiveness. to be indispensable virtuousnesss that need to be practiced on a greater graduated table in our society and inculcated into its cultural ethos. I to the full agree that compassion is the grade of higher development in human existences. and decease punishment would so look to be a item of man’s inhumaneness to adult male. or â€Å"legalized murder† as it is called. Death penalty would look to belong to the class of the â€Å"an oculus for an oculus. a tooth for a tooth† jurisprudence which is more likely to be practiced in crude communities instead than in advanced societies like ours: If anyone injures his neighbour. whatever he has done must be done to him: break for break. oculus for oculus. tooth for tooth. As he has injured the other. so he is to be injured. ( Leviticus 24:19-20 ) However crude it may look. the construct of requital has its topographic point in our condemnable justness system. Retribution. or a life for a life in our present context. as an purpose of penalty is based on our society’s profoundly deep-rooted impressions of justness. equity and desert. The justification for requital centres on the two cardinal issues of proportionality. which is fiting of the penalty to offense. and blameworthiness. which is the appraisal of moral guilt. It involves the inquiry of the moral rating of different sorts of offenses and how to get at appropriate penalty graduated tables ( Tombs. 2005 ) . When the members of the legal system make appraisals of proportionality. either in footings of the length of prison sentences. or the imposing of capital penalty. they besides take their determinations while endeavoring to make a morally justifiable appraisal of blameworthiness. Death punishment is frequently favored from the point of position of blameworthines s and requital. although I am non certain in respect to the effectivity of decease punishment as a hindrance. Incapacitation. disincentive and requital seem to be primary ends of condemnable penalty. But they are non everything. Imposition of hurting should non be exclusive intent of condemning ( Haney A ; Zimbardo 1998 ) . There are other elements which need to calculate in our judgement sing even the most serious of offenses such as compassion and where applicable. rehabilitation. The more evolved a society is. the higher value it has for consideration and compassion. However. exactly mentioning the evidences of compassion. I would wish to reason that capital penalty when implemented in sensible and justifiable mode. is more contributing to the impressions of clemency and forgiveness than life imprisonment in its topographic point. Let me give exemplify my point. In 2002. the Council of Europe amended its Protocol No. 6. which was originally passed in 1983 criminalizing capital penalty except under certain conditions. to enforce an unconditioned prohibition on decease punishment even for offenses committed during wars and race murders ( Rifkin 2004 ) . Harmonizing the presently predominating European jurisprudence. therefore. even a consummate Nazi war felon such as Adolf Eichmann. who was responsible for the slaying of 1000000s of Jews. would be spared decease sentence and given life imprisonment. To some people. such a judgement could look to be epitome of forgiveness and moral development of human head. I fail to see it that manner though. I would believe the stoping of Eichmann’s life would be much more good to himself than it is good to society. There is utterly no point in such monsters populating twenty-four hours after twenty-four hours for months. old ages and decennaries cooped up in a prison cell. provided free repasts and adjustment throughout at the revenue enhancement payer’s disbursal. Eichmann or Al Capone. such people have lived like male monarchs. idea of themselves to be all powerful. and perpetrated some of the grim offenses conceivable. It is a calamity that such people did non acquire caught any Oklahoman. but when they eventually acquire caught. it would be another calamity to allow them decompose in a prison cell for the remainder of their lives. being a load to themselves. to the province. to humanity and the Earth itself. If their lives are terminated every bit rapidly as possible. it would be an huge alleviation to the society and even greater alleviation to themselves. But go forthing aside such high profile felons. even if we regard run-of-the-mine earnestly deranged psychopathologic felons in general. most of these individuals are overly anguished psyches. There is no demand to sympathise with them. but there is a demand to sympathize with them because they excessively portion a human psyche and human consciousness. We must see the fact that they non merely commit great enduring on their fellow human existences. but they themselves live in a practical snake pit. driven by dark irresistible impulse and maniacal inclinations on which they do non look to hold any control. It would be a great approval for them so to acquire rid of themselves. though it would non do any existent and important difference to the society at big whether these people are executed or confined in a prison cell for the remainder of their lives after acquiring apprehended. I am of the steadfast sentiment that all such felons are deeply ill in their heads. and the most humanist class of action in their respect would be to subject them to effectual psychological intervention and bring around their unwellness. However. even in the European states. no such intervention is given to liquidators and consecutive slayers who are spared the decease punishment. No such intervention can be given at all. in the first topographic point. because no such intervention exists at the current phase of promotion of our medical scientific discipline. In the hereafter. a specific set of cistrons could be discovered that render these monstrous human existences into what they are. for illustration. and possibly ways could be devised to deactivate them. but in the absence of such progresss in our medical engineering. we are forced to fall back to capital penalty as the most effectual and meaningful declaration to a psychopathologic. violent and condemnable life. In a more rational and humanist society. hence. decease punishment would be much more widely practiced. and non curbed or banned wholly as it is at present in European and many other states of the universe. I am all for reforming and rehabilitating people with condemnable inclinations. which is unluckily something really seldom practiced in our prison communities even in the most advanced Western states. However. it is following to impossible to work on and efficaciously transform the basic nature of the deeply sick people that are normally slated for the electric chair or the deadly injection in states such as the United States. within the range of our bing province of cognition of human head. The conditions being such. the most simple. commonsense. and compassionate option would be to present a quick and easy decease to these lost psyches who figure in 100s upon 100s in our society. In fact. such decease need non be seen as decease â€Å"penalty† or capital â€Å"punishment † but as a signifier of mercy killing. Euthanasia. when administered judiciously. is a manifestation of compassion of adult male towards adult male. It is really dry that European states. some of which title-holder mercy killing in instances of lasting vegetive province or even in cases of torturing and irremediable unwellnesss. are so set against the execution of capital penalty which is most frequently non a penalty at all but a welcome approval. The primary statement which most oppositions of decease punishment extend is a wholly absurd one on the face of it. They say that decease punishment is barbarian pattern. a clear indicant of vindictive beastly outlook in human existences that seeks an oculus for an oculus and a tooth for a tooth. But this is obviously non the instance. Most consecutive slayers. for case. torment their victims in impossible ways and kill them merely after they derived their dosage of sadistic merriment from transporting out monstrous mischievousness. If our jurisprudence were entirely based on the rule of retribution and merely comeuppances. or put in another manner. action and reaction. as the oppositions of decease punishment allege. so a culprit of barbarous violent deaths would hold to given back all the enormous physical hurting and mental torment which he brought on to his victims jointly. plus ‘interest’ . and be viciously killed merely at the terminal of a drawn-out enchantment of indefinable torture. The felon should be shown the gustatory sensation of life snake pit in full step before his life is terminated in due class. and such a line of action would in fact seem absolutely just. Alternatively. the felons sentenced to decease in our society are given the most royal. clinical. instantaneous and comfy decease conceivable – something which most of can merely envy. In normal life. really seldom do people achieve such painless and instantaneous deceases. In consequence. to an impartial perceiver. our decease punishment should look like a particular award bestowed on privileged individuals. Even by the furthest stretch of imaginativeness. decease punishment as it is practiced in the United States. Japan and other advanced states of the modern universe can non be seen as an illustration of crude ‘tit for tat’ outlook. though in fact ‘tit for tat’ would hold been really just and justifiable in its ain manner. Quite to the contrary. decease sentence wh en given in purely sensible fortunes backed by clear grounds is evidently an case of a higher moral jurisprudence as that preached by Jesus Christ or the Buddha. It is an illustration of â€Å"love thy enemy† or â€Å"do good unto people those who harm you. † Death is non the worst catastrophe that can bechance a human being. There are 1000s of ways of hurting and agony conceivable that are 100s of clip worse than decease. Often life imprisonment. populating like a veggie without freedom or hope. could convey about vastly more arduous physical and mental hurting than a Swift and painless decease. Therefore I recommend that we take a more broad attitude to decease punishment and to get down with quickly present it to the 1000s of people expecting it in our extremely overcrowded prisons. Mentions: Daynes. B. W. A ; Tatalovich. R. ( 1998 ) .Moral Controversies in American Politicss: Cases in Social Regulatory Policy.Armonk. New york: M. E. Sharpe. Inc Haney. C A ; Zimbardo. P. ( 1998 ) .The Past and Future of U. S. Prison Policy Twenty-Five Old ages After the Stanford Prison Experiment.American Psychologist.July 1998. Vol. 53. No. 7. Pp. 709-727 Rifkin. J. ( 2004 ) .The European Dream: How Europe’s Vision of the Future Is Softly Overshadowing the American Dream. Cambridge: Polity Press Tombs. J. ( 2005 ) .Reducing the Prison Population: Penal Policy and Social Choices. Edinburgh: Scots Consortium on Crime A ; Criminal Justice

First They Killed My Father essays

First They Killed My Father essays Loung Ung was the next to youngest of eight children born into a middle-class family living in Phnom Penh, and the daughter of a former member of the Cambodian Royal Secret Service under Prince Sihanouk. Conscripted as a major into the new government of General Lon Nol, her father was the incarnation of all that the Khmer Rouge wanted to obliterate when they stormed Cambodia's capital city on April 17, 1975, beginning their reign of terror. Fleeing with her family into the countryside, along with thousands of others who were evacuating Phnom Penh, Loung learned the first of many hard lessons. In order to survive, she had to hide her identity, her education, her former life of privilege. It was no longer safe to trust anyone. "To talk is to bring danger to the family. At five years old, I am beginning to know what loneliness feels like, silent and alone and suspecting that everyone wants to hurt me." Posing as peasants, Loung's family moved from village to village, hoping that no one would recognize and expose them as enemies of the Khmer Rouge government. Working 12-14 hour days and barely surviving on their meager rations, they supplemented their diet with roots and leaves or small animals that they trapped. When those became scarce, they caught beetles, crickets, grasshoppers, and frogs for food. "In Phnom Penh, I would have thrown up if someone told me I would have to eat those things. Now, when the only alternative is to starve, I fight others for a dead animal lying in the road. Surviving for another day has become the most important thing to me." Although Loung's three oldest siblings - her brothers, Khouy and Meng, and her sister, Keav-were forced to go to different labor camps, the rest of the family struggled to stay together. After the soldiers came for Loung's father, they separated to survive. Finding her way to a work camp for orphans, Loung began training as a child soldier and was subjected to brainwashing. F ...

Overview and Explanation of ZIP Codes

Overview and Explanation of ZIP Codes ZIP Codes, five-digit numbers that represent small areas of the United States, were created by the United States Postal Service in 1963 to aid in the efficiency of delivering the ever-increasing volume of mail. The term ZIP is short for Zone Improvement Plan. The First Mail Coding System During World War II, the United States Postal Service (USPS) suffered from a shortage of experienced laborers who left the country to serve in the military. In order to deliver mail more efficiently, the USPS created a coding system in 1943 to divide delivery areas within the 124 largest cities in the country. The code would appear between the city and the state (e.g., Seattle 6, Washington). By the 1960s, the volume of mail (and population) had dramatically increased as a vast majority of the nations mail was no longer personal correspondence but business mail such as bills, magazines, and advertisements. The post office needed a better system to manage the huge quantities of material that moved through the mail each day.   Creating the ZIP Code System The USPS developed major mail processing centers on the outskirts of major metropolitan areas to avoid the transportation problems and delays of transporting mail directly to the center of cities. With the development of the processing centers, the  United States Postal Service established ZIP (Zone Improvement Program) Codes. The idea for a ZIP Code System originated with Philadelphia postal inspector Robert Moon in 1944. Moon thought that a new coding system was needed, believing that the end of mail by train was soon to come and instead, planes were to be a huge part of the mails future. Interestingly, it took nearly 20 years to convince the USPS that a new code was needed and to implement it. ZIP Codes, which were first announced to the public on July 1, 1963, were designed to help better distribute the growing amount of mail in the United States. Every address in the United States was assigned a specific ZIP Code. At this time, however, the use of ZIP Codes was still optional. In 1967, the use of ZIP Codes was made mandatory for bulk mailers and the public caught on quickly. In order to further streamline mail processing, in 1983 the USPS added a four-digit code to the end of ZIP Codes, the ZIP4, to break ZIP Codes into smaller geographic regions based on delivery routes. Decoding the Code The five-digit ZIP Codes begin with a digit from 0-9 that represents a region of the United States. 0 represents the northeastern U.S. and 9 is used for the western states (see list below). The next two digits identify a commonly linked transportation region and the last two digits pinpoint the correct processing center and post office.   ZIP Codes were created to expedite mail processing, not to identify neighborhoods or regions. Their boundaries are based on the logistical and transportation needs of the United States Postal Service and not on neighborhoods, watersheds, or community cohesion. It is troubling that so much geographic data is based and available based only on ZIP Codes.   Using ZIP Code-based geographic data is not an excellent choice, especially since ZIP Code boundaries are subject to change at any time and do not represent true communities or neighborhoods. ZIP Code data is not appropriate for many geographic purposes, but has, unfortunately, come to be the standard for dividing up cities, communities, or counties into different neighborhoods. It would be wise for data providers and mapmakers alike to avoid the use of ZIP Codes when developing geographic products but there is often no other consistent method of determining neighborhoods within the diverse geographies of the local political boundaries of the United States. The Nine ZIP Code Regions of the United States There are a handful of exceptions to this list where parts of a state are in a different region but for the most part, the states lie within one of the following nine ZIP Code regions: 0 - Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire,  Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Jersey. 1 - New York, Pennsylvania, and Delaware 2 - Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Washington D.C., North Carolina and South Carolina 3 - Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida 4 - Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky 5 - Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin 6 - Illinois, Missouri, Nebraska, and Kansas 7 - Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana 8 - Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, Arizona, Utah, New Mexico, and Nevada 9 - California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii Fun ZIP Code Facts Lowest: 00501 is the lowest numbered ZIP Code, which is for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in Holtsville, New York Highest: 99950 corresponds to Ketchikan, Alaska 12345: The easiest ZIP Code goes to the headquarters of General Electric in Schenectady, New York Total Number: As of June 2015, there are 41,733 ZIP Codes in the U.S. Number of People: Each ZIP Code contains approximately 7,500 people Mr. Zip: A cartoon character, created by Harold Wilcox of the Cunningham and Walsh advertising company, used by USPS in the 1960s and 70s to promote the ZIP Code system. Secret: The President and the first family have their own, private ZIP Code that is not publicly known.

Catheter associated urinary tract infections Term Paper

Catheter associated urinary tract infections - Term Paper Example . The use of the urinary catheter has some side effects such as kidney failure or even weakening of the body’s general defense mechanism. The kidneys are responsible for filtering the urine so as to make urine, and when there is an infection, especially an untreated infection, it might lead to kidney failure. This tube is usually used when there a person cannot urinate on their own, and hence this tube is inserted to help drain the urine. It can also be used when there is need and essence to establish the amount of urine that a person’s body makes, especially when the person is hospitalized. The tube can also be used when carrying out kidney and bladder tests, and when performing some surgeries (Gotelli et al, 2008). This tube has been associated with urinary tract infections, with some of the signs of the infections being blood in urine, frequent but painful urination after the catheter has been removed and lower abdominal pain. The use of catheter tubes is at times co nsidered a risk to patient safety due to the high rate of infections. The tube provides a more direct access for bacteria and other infectious organisms into the bladder (Bernard, Hunter and Moore, 2012). The after and long term effects of the use of the catheter tube might be very adverse, and this necessitates the need for a solution, an alternative or an intervention. Intervention The adverse effects resulting from the use of the urinary tract catheter shows that there is need for intervention. In this case, the suggested intervention to aid in the reduction of the effects is proposed in several ways. The use of indwelling catheters use only follow after the patients records have been checked and it has been determined that it is a must for the catheter to be used (Bernard, Hunter and Moore, 2012). If there is another way of administering treatment without using the tube on the patient, then this should be adopted. It also follows that the catheter should be removed from the pati ent’s body as soon as possible to minimize the chances of infection. In addition, the direct staff and all nurses should ensure that they are properly trained on handling the catheter. This includes frequent and thorough washing of hands before and after handling the catheter. Gotelli et al (2008) clearly propose that the se of external catheters in intermittent urethral catherization might be part of the intervention. Urethral catherization is very sensitive and is among the leading causes of urinary tract infections. By the health staff gaining enough competence concerning how to handle and use the catheter, chances are that the cases of the infection might probably reduce. The doctors and other health staff have become too used to the urinary tract infections such that introducing the intervention might not be too easy (Gotelli et al, 2008). Competence Outcome and Performance Assessment model To investigate and potentially assess the interventions, the Competence Outcomes and Performance Outcome theoretical approach and framework shall be used. This model has been earlier on been applied in academic and non-academic institutions, and has succeeded in works environment, especially the health industry since it is encourages adopting the environment in contemporary living (Lenburg, 1999). It is a model that seeks not to change the traditional way of learning but to make learning, in all academic and

Goodwin Development Trust Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Goodwin Development Trust - Essay Example This demonstrates how Goodwin networks the community in Hull to improve the quality of life for everyone. To sum up, the Goodwin statement â€Å"Our overall goal is to improve the quality of life of people living in deprived neighborhoods. We aim to do this by helping communities and community-based organizations to develop innovative new services through practical learning, knowledge management, and networking†, says it all. (The Goodwin Trust Link) 2 Introduction Nearly any community anywhere comprises of the Haves and the Have Nots. It is a universal phenomenon and has existed from time immemorial. However, in each era, there have been conscious individuals or institutions that have taken care of the needy, poor and deserving. Usually, this was out of pity, religious teachings and occasionally out of love for the fellow brethren. This act of charity was limited to a few of the higher strata and was not universally practiced. In the modern era, however, due to higher levels of education that are now widespread, and also due to more liberal outlooks the community at large has started feeling uncomfortable at the existence of pockets that lag behind in education and resources. There has also been a feeling of resentment from the have not which was duly acknowledged by others. The feeling of obligation to give a helping hand has become more pronounced than ever before. Out of this has born the need to institutionalize the noble act of charity and people from all over the community participate in it.

Belize Guatamala territory dispute :: essays research papers

British lumberjacks set up settlements in the eventual Belize. The Spanish granted them the territory. When war broke out in Europe there was an attack which was repulsed. Over the next 20 years the British had grown into the assigned area and some unsettled areas of South America establishing the now existing Belize. The Spanish never had any rule over the territory. Up to 1859 the British continued to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over the settlement, further establishing administrative control and implementing a comprehensive legal and legislative system. In 1859 a treaty officially established the boundaries of Belize. In 1940 Guatemala declared the Treaty to be void, alleging failure to implement article 7 (That the British build a road which they never did) A new Guatemalan Constitution in 1945 declared Belize to be Guatemalan territory Belizean culture and nationality developed throughout the 19th century (and the British became the minority). Self-government was achieved in 1964, but full independence was delayed until 1981 only because of the Guatemalan claim to the territory. Guatemala changed its argument in 1999. it rested its case on the 18th century Treaties between Britain and Spain covering the area between the Hondo and the Sibun Rivers. Guatemala claimed that the area between the Sibun River and the Sarstoon River was 'illegally' occupied by Britain, and argued that the area south of Sibun up to the Sarstoon River must be "returned" to Guatemala together with all the cayes which were not included in those Treaties. The area thus claimed by Guatemala amounts to over 12,000 square kilometres, which is more than half of Belize's territory. The British occupied this territory when it was uninhabited and unsettled. Belize rests its case on two firm pillars: the right of a people to self- determination and the fact that Guatemala's claim is legally untenable. Negotiations began between Britain and Guatemala and Belize. In 1975 the UN General Assembly passed a resolution affirming Belize's right to secure independence with all its territory and declared that any proposals emerging from negotiations between Britain and Guatemala must respect this right In 1980, the UN resolution declared that Belize should become independent by the following year. The entire global community supported this decision the territory was perfected through the process of acquisitive prescription, which is a recognised means in International Law for acquiring title to territory Guatemala never occupied, nor did it ever exercise any control or jurisdiction over, any part of the territory of Belize.

Understand The Role Of Communication And Interactions With Individuals Who Have Dementia

People who have dementia can communicate in different ways depending on how they feel and the type of dementia someone has. If an individual has dementia they might not be able to speak so as a career it’s important to read the body language of the individual. If they make funny noises or they are acting out of character or if they are being very loud then this may mean they are not happy and that they are angry. If they are lively and smiling and laughing then this may mean that they are happy and is feeling in a good mood.If the individual suddenly gets up from his/her arm chair and walks around then if may mean that they need to go to the toilet. If an individual who has dementia can talk then you can usually know how they are feeling through their tone of voice. If the tone of voice is sharp and clear then it might mean that they are upset or cross, if they are very quiet and talking softly then it might be scared and feeling very lonely.It is very easy to misinterpret som eone who has dementia. For example, If a lady or gentleman gets up from the chair and walks to the other side of the room, careers may think that he/she just wants to walk around to stretch his/her legs but in fact he/she needs to go to the toilet. Another example would be if a gentlemen is shouting for no apparent reason it might be because he is in pain but doesn’t know how to tell someone, a career might not realise this and may this he wants something instead. Also another example would be if a lady is asked if they would like something and they said no but actually they mean yes they would, careers wouldn’t realise what she means and ends up not giving her anything.There are different types of dementia which may affect the way someone will communicate. Dementia will affect an individual’s communication depending of what part of the brain the disease has affected. Here is a table to show which dementia effects communications.DementiaHow it affects communicat ion Alzheimer’s diseaseIf someone has Alzheimer’s disease then they regularly forget names, faces and recent events. They have problem finding the right words so can be hard making a conversation. Also they would have mood or behaviour problems such as irritability or loss in confidence so it would be hard for them to talk to someone and describe want they would like and making decisions. Vascular DementiaPeople with this type of dementia would find it hard to communicate because they find it difficult finding the right words to say. They may use inappropriate words which people may get offended as they don’t understand. They also become more emotional which again may affect the way they communicate to someone. Dementia with Lewy bodiesIndividuals with this type of dementia would find it difficult to communicate because of the variation in attention. It may be hard to communicate because they wouldn’t be focused as they are confused and not really listeni ng. FTD (Frontotemporal Dementia)This dementia is quite rare as it affects only 11,000 people in the UK compared with dementia with lewy bodies which affects about 100,000 people in the UK. People with FTD will have a decline in language abilities so they would find it difficult with trying to find the right word, finding it difficult to speak and have trouble with understanding common words and people’s names. Also in the later stages the reason why an individual may find it hard to communicate relates to the persons memory.The physical and mental needs that would affect communication with someone who had dementia would be a stroke. If someone had dementia it would be hard for them to try and talk and communicate but with a stroke as well it would be really hard to communicate as they would lose the use of their one side so their speech would be even more affected. In time the individual would get frustrated because they can’t speak and explain to people what they wan t or need. A mental affect with communication would be depression. If an individual had dementia and also suffered with depression, they would find it hard to talk to people as they find it hard to live through each  day. They would find it hard to talk because of their dementia so they would be able to express how they feel therefore would become even more depressed.If an individual has dementia had a sensory impairment would find it difficult to communicate. For example if gentlemen could see he would find it hard to explain what he wants as he can’t talk very well due to the dementia. Even if u offered a choice to him he would be able to say which one he wanted because of the dementia and would be able to point to the choice he would like because he can’t see. If a lady had a hearing impairment and had dementia she would find it hard because she would feel like she was in some sort of bubble as she can’t hear or talk to people. She would feel so down and de pressed because there is a lack of understanding between the carer and the individual. The lady’s well being would decline and her eating habits may also decrease as well.The environment would affect an individual who suffer from dementia because they wouldn’t recognise their surroundings so they would feel lost and maybe scared. It is important to have things and objects that they recognise because they won’t forget who they are. People who have dementia lose their confidence so being in a different environment would ‘throw them out of place’ so to speak. They would feel even lonelier as they wouldn’t know anyone. Having new things around you would make an individual with dementia feel even more disorientated as they would feel agitated and wouldn’t be able to relax because they are not familiar with the environment.The way people interact with dementia patients can vary between the way careers or other people behave towards them. For example is a career was feeling down, looking miserable and not putting any effort into their working then the individual would see and feel it and would not cooperate with you. If a career was really happy, jolly and being loud the individual may feel intimidated and again they wouldn’t want to cooperate. If the career was calm, relaxed and spoke in a clear voice then the chances are the individual would comply and do things as you ask. It is very important to know how to approach a person with dementia because they don’t know who you are so you can’t do anything that they wouldn’t like. You would have to be  polite and give clear instructions of you would like them to do. If you are friendly with them then they would be friendly back.The way you talk to someone with dementia is very important because it’s hard for the person to understand what they are doing because they have dementia but if you say it in a way that’s positive, loud and clear you would try get them to understand. You would have to speak proper English especially if you are working with the elderly, you can’t use any slang words because they wouldn’t understand what you mean. When talking you must slow down so they can hear what you are ask and you have to be polite when asking otherwise they would find you rude and words because again they would do what you ask.Also you have to talk in simple terms and not use big words because again they wouldn’t understand and if you do ask them to do something don’t ask all at once, ask in stages, for example if you are helping someone to get up in the morning instead of asking ‘Can you get out of bed’?, ask them in stages, Can you sit up’? Then ‘can you bring your feet around’? And then ‘can you stand up please’? This way the individuals thought process is less so can do each step at a time. This in time would make the individual more ha ppier and comfortable being around you and overall a positive atmosphere.